CCbill creates a no risk environment for SPAMers
First of all, let me make it perfectly clear that I am not suggesting, in any way, that CCbill is intentionally encouraging SPAMers. What I am saying is they have a policy that, when exercised, creates an environment of opportunity for the SPAMers.
As we all know the FTC has been cracking down on affiliate programs that, in the FTC’s opinion, are not proactive in shutting down their affiliates’ SPAM activities. Most affiliate programs have, in their program’s terms and conditions, a strong statement that SPAM activity is not allowed. Often the terms go on to state that any webmaster caught SPAMing will be terminated and all commissions with be forfeited.
Webmasters outside the US are not subject to US antiSPAM laws. The only way to curb their SPAM activity is to make it unprofitable. Unfortunately an affiliate program, using CCbill services, is in for a big surprise if it tries to enforce their forfeiture of commission policy. As it turns out CCbill does not honor such policies, and will go forward with paying the offending affiliate webmaster. This sends a clear, all be it unintentional, message to SPAMers that there is no risk in SPAMing at programs using CCbill.
This is frustrating for programs that are trying to establish a reputation, in the eyes of the FTC, that they are proactive in the fight against SPAM. One affiliate program I spoke with says the CCbill policy ties their hands, and creates an unwelcome cloud of liability.
While CCbill is aware of this issue, no change in policy has been announced. Perhaps CCbill needs more input from their clients, as one or two complaints may not be enough to drive a policy change.















