I was all geared up to write a piece about the leakiest tour I’d ever seen. Then I decided to first practice what I preach, and dropped them a short note explaining why I could not justify sending my traffic to their site.

The next day I received a reply from Male Perfection letting me know they had gone through the tour and removed all leaks but one. The remaining leak is a link to their other site, and the sponsor is working with CCbill to resolve that with a cookie.

Here are a couple of snips from their reply…

“I had to look up “leaky tours” and spent a great deal of time researching all of the ways that sites leak.”

“You opened our eyes how outward links were not only hurting our affiliates, but our web site as a whole.”

I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again. Webmasters need to tell sponsors they won’t promote their sites if leaks are in the tours. For some it only takes one message from a webmaster to get things changed. Others need to hear it from many different webmasters before they finally realize just how much the leaks are impacting their affiliate recruitment efforts.

Leaks are not tolerated by mainstream affiliate marketers, so why should it be any different with adult site promoters?